From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Terje Bergstrom <tbergstrom@nvidia.com>,
Arto Merilainen <amerilainen@nvidia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>,
Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>
Subject: Why have another variable deciding a tracepoint?
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:48:12 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131114234812.3bf7bce9@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
I've been reviewing different users of tracepoints and I stumbled
across this:
drivers/gpu/host1x/cdma.c: host1x_cdma_push()
if (host1x_debug_trace_cmdbuf)
trace_host1x_cdma_push(dev_name(cdma_to_channel(cdma)->dev),
op1, op2);
That host1x_debug_trace_cmdbuf is a variable that gets set by another
debugfs file "trace_cmdbuf" that is custom to this driver.
Why?
The tracepoint host1x_cdma_push is already controlled by either ftrace
or perf. If it gets enabled by perf or ftrace, it still wont be traced
unless we also enable this trace_cmdbuf. Is there some reason for this?
I can't figure it out from the change log: 6236451d83a720 ("gpu:
host1x: Add debug support").
As tracepoints uses jump labels, there is no branch cost associated
with them. That is, they are either a direct jump, or a nop (in most
cases a nop). But here you added the overhead of a conditional branch
depending on this variable.
If this is truly needed, then use TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION() for that
tracepoint.
/me is baffled
-- Steve
next reply other threads:[~2013-11-15 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-15 4:48 Steven Rostedt [this message]
2013-11-15 8:17 ` Terje Bergström
2013-11-15 14:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-11-18 6:48 ` Terje Bergström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131114234812.3bf7bce9@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=amerilainen@nvidia.com \
--cc=kusmabite@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tbergstrom@nvidia.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®