From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753498Ab3KSSyB (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:54:01 -0500 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:48960 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751421Ab3KSSyA (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Nov 2013 13:54:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:53:37 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org Message-ID: <20131119185337.GK2674@sirena.org.uk> References: <1384859269-19801-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2XUWoe1nmt7t49kG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1384859269-19801-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> X-Cookie: Drive defensively. Buy a tank. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.92.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] ASoC: dma: ARM: ux500: Obtain DMA data from Device Tree X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --2XUWoe1nmt7t49kG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:07:39AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > If this patch-set could go through ASoC as a whole, it would drive down > the chance of a dependency mess. Vinod has already provided Acks for his > parts, so it's just between you two Linus and Mark. I applied the refactoring patches since they didn't seem to depend on the DMA patches - they're on topic/ux500 in ASoC but I can easily drop them or they can be merged elsewhere if required (I'll rebase once the merge window closes anyway). Let me know and I can provide a tag. I'm happy to merge the first few patches if that's easiest for everyone else, let me know and send them to me if that's what works for people. --2XUWoe1nmt7t49kG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSi7OuAAoJELSic+t+oim91OAP/3Xf395Qnd57uor+jcolwhIl 5PGxr8dnO8KQnYJ8QLeDl1T6KeoIRKhXOfYxEESIHlW7+rgJja25S0vm2aJUQAbM gABOlYwLZB+ba00UmGltgkfK0yEQQZY5viKI5zi6Yt+M85zlOSAG8wq27RqiagXY KAqBjtKC1UA/KhbAkGrC35GaokxuuvoRivrD7BVEng5GDxMKz8RXEadY5G1z2bD6 Vu3/6vizHGGY5f30T9MVGEP6njesQ94fXAJutriYCadsvIzQWArjKzsOH9pfCepc rmtimnwzewbMOKEIi66aPZHb10T19QeP3S1h2unsSL43tQOY/P2O3NvlnSQ3pPzO J04oeZ0NFccTvGSUguDtjtxN3oJBDPnrWhT9gIBFAqqzr2KvSzyBbV8/E6VfeNt5 lDql2RNR+4hmcP08RrI7ZRmLub1KiGvptPWOGzA0sBuvVLFBaOpWLajg6SzOxLEY ME/mrKTDFtz2F4syFfMHH5My/q8D6fv+JWOIxlWdWpq8/Uobihtr+xSH7THXwlcJ Y7FohmFxWg8ZmHBbaqvOyVmseZ82D6WeCZjuZvzorbnH3kI7nEeWOZ75JbjLbWMK cKy5odtH8BgdRpKWskrLQ5NI2SmU/xIoOrKFyutQgpUkXyHfReVHxQO0wcMDQi+U 3ckoHw1x8bbNauAJKm3o =HlK5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2XUWoe1nmt7t49kG--