From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com>,
Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
rui.zhang@intel.com, Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@online.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
hpa@zytor.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] preempt: Take away preempt_enable_no_resched() from modules
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 20:00:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131120190011.GX16796@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131120105457.04f6e51e@ultegra>
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:54:57AM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote:
> run into a couple of compile issues.
>
> 1)
> include/linux/rcupdate.h: In function ‘rcu_read_unlock_sched_notrace’:
> include/linux/rcupdate.h:889:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘preempt_enable_no_resched_notrace’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> 2)
> In file included from drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c:41:0:
> include/linux/uaccess.h: In function ‘pagefault_enable’:
> include/linux/uaccess.h:34:2: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘preempt_check_resched’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> 1) happens when CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set, perhaps add a dummy function?
Ah, indeed, will fix.
> 2) I am not sure if we should take pagefault_enable away from modules
We can't I think, I'll have to fix that up. Easiest would be to make
preempt_check_resched() available again. That function actually adds
preemption points so its not bad.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-20 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-20 16:04 [PATCH 0/7] Cure some vaux idle wrackage Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 16:04 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86, acpi, idle: Restructure the mwait idle routines Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 16:04 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched, preempt: Fixup missed PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED folding Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-21 8:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 16:04 ` [PATCH 3/7] idle, thermal, acpi: Remove home grown idle implementations Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 16:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-11-20 16:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 17:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-20 17:23 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-11-20 17:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-20 18:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-11-20 19:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-20 22:08 ` Jacob Pan
2013-11-21 0:54 ` Jacob Pan
2013-11-21 8:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-21 16:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-21 16:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-11-21 19:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-21 19:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2013-11-21 20:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-22 0:10 ` Jacob Pan
2013-11-22 4:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-22 11:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-22 17:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-21 16:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-21 17:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-11-20 16:04 ` [PATCH 4/7] preempt, locking: Rework local_bh_{dis,en}able() Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 16:04 ` [PATCH 5/7] locking: Optimize lock_bh functions Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 16:04 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched: Clean up preempt_enable_no_resched() abuse Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 18:02 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-11-20 18:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 20:14 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-11-21 10:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-21 13:26 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-11-21 13:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-22 6:56 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-11-22 11:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-26 7:15 ` Eliezer Tamir
2013-11-26 10:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-11-20 16:04 ` [PATCH 7/7] preempt: Take away preempt_enable_no_resched() from modules Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 18:54 ` Jacob Pan
2013-11-20 19:00 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-11-20 19:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 19:29 ` Jacob Pan
2013-11-20 16:34 ` [PATCH 0/7] Cure some vaux idle wrackage Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-20 17:19 ` Jacob Pan
2013-11-20 17:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131120190011.GX16796@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bitbucket@online.de \
--cc=christopher.leech@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome