From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755154Ab3KUUvR (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:51:17 -0500 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:59292 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753861Ab3KUUvQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 15:51:16 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 20:50:50 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Olof Johansson Cc: Felipe Balbi , Laxman Dewangan , Liam Girdwood , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux OMAP Mailing List Message-ID: <20131121205050.GF14725@sirena.org.uk> References: <20131120175814.GC27423@saruman.home> <20131120203400.GL2674@sirena.org.uk> <20131120205143.GA9182@saruman.home> <20131121024840.GA22970@saruman.home> <20131121104911.GM2674@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Pql/uPZNXIm1JCle" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Your supervisor is thinking about you. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.92.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: commit c368e5fc2a190923b786f2de3e79430ea3566a25 regresses MMC X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Pql/uPZNXIm1JCle Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:27:06PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > If you have one email address listed in MAINTAINERS, and do all your > actual work with another identity, you might want to look at your > workflow a bit. I suggest either signing off with the MAINTAINERS The only thing that uses the work address is patches and signoffs, all my e-mail traffic is done from my kernel.org address (including patch posts). > email address, or changing the entries of that file. People should > expect to be able to email you on the address you sign off with. Unfortunately my employer can't cope with that at present and I don't really want to use my work address for everything since all the stuff =66rom upstream DoSs the stuff that pays the bills. I wouldn't mind if people mailed both, but if you're going to pick a single one then the one listed in MAINTAINERS is the way forwards (which generally is the address people manage to pick). /me notes that he'd probably have been less grumpy if the message had a subject line that had content in it, even had it gone to the right mailbox there's a good chance I'd never even have opened the mail due to that - if anything it going to the wrong place actually worked around the subject line here. --Pql/uPZNXIm1JCle Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSjnInAAoJELSic+t+oim9oDgP/34R0SqmILHILWrtkNFBDE9v 7HwE6jXjlQ84safDUk040X3npHld5DeIdJ6OZxRsSZdzvyUQIxAO3VLDFUC9zzUV GrYH5+Gm3nWwjDczrQtctUZHn5jjOUpno+coiALSpCW//Ca933bW6wkO0ZW8cfTp CCQ4cxUgTTIZf8y52yqjU4O0ImFNn2+AhtXojIs+3zDTinkTWz/gt6hKI7r5ZN1H fBl9xnuiv0sPO1WTytvKIYiCkfpC3bt4USOSMzhAXLfQcv4pV4eyV2bUTzUzCUGA usgoCiAMfdgQFb8oqi4LXMFYYHjpcKqEKIerNXS1BWlIbQiq85iL2WQJ2jam3uh7 mrZ9XejZKOM8wD6rAVfY3szmTyqaDjzhlhySF9RP+XvoYrfOqARNY77xPJrUj19Y MwL31S5E3i+21SJkaI6Kqc27h2GbsnnutKiUIZlqQyzZSe+WwHr2TSKKoavwg6XH 9UjBp8JKEC0il4CCGEkWtqJAw8s+MEgTy14vtqpo+OZngkYNubmM/ci7cNgMgomu IO+Rfzfff7Z/MFMuS1wc9wG7iZhSMUbfjCQC0eQMDQJJYdsUpQgic+u/cRsJQ6Vm HHmI53ZMkKt75xfR5R5zKLzxvMPRVnWqbfkI3tzjKSzocYFzXfe3C2+Fq0PRnE+v ZU6SyprWmU979QJ5NDP8 =HZwY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Pql/uPZNXIm1JCle--