From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752849Ab3KYIgL (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 25 Nov 2013 03:36:11 -0500
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:48103 "EHLO mga02.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751596Ab3KYIgH (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 25 Nov 2013 03:36:07 -0500
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,766,1378882800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="441053224"
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 10:35:59 +0200
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
        Rhyland Klein <rklein@nvidia.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>,
        Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] net: rfkill: gpio: remove gpio conversion support
Message-ID: <20131125083559.GA21001@xps8300>
References: <1385122474-14926-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
 <1385122474-14926-4-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
 <528FA520.7080501@wwwdotorg.org>
 <20131122205640.GA21895@xps8300>
 <528FC60A.80308@wwwdotorg.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <528FC60A.80308@wwwdotorg.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 02:00:58PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 11/22/2013 01:56 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > I have prepared a separate patch where I remove those and some other
> > unused fields from the pdata structure (attachment). Would it be OK to
> > add that to this patch set? Or should this patch simply be updated?
> 
> I would suggest killing off the two GPIO fields in this patch, since
> it's logically part of this change. I think the balance of the patch is
> unrelated to gpiod conversion, so should probably be sent separately,
> although watch out for dependencies.

Yes, we'll do it like that.

Thanks,

-- 
heikki