From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932829Ab3K0BdS (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:33:18 -0500 Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176]:44072 "EHLO mail-ie0-f176.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754192Ab3K0BdN (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Nov 2013 20:33:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 17:33:09 -0800 From: Brian Norris To: Ivan Khoronzhuk Cc: Santosh Shilimkar , Rob Landley , Russell King , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, Pawel Moll , Stephen Warren , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] Reuse davinci-nand driver for Keystone arch Message-ID: <20131127013309.GT9468@ld-irv-0074.broadcom.com> References: <1385033305-13179-1-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1385033305-13179-1-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Ivan, On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 01:28:15PM +0200, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote: > This series contains fixes and updates of Davinci nand driver in > order to reuse it for Keystone platform. > > The series is combination of two following series: > - Davinci nand driver fixes and updates: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/271 > - Reuse davinci-nand driver for Keystone arch > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/11/20/315 Can you make sure to consistently change the email $subject for your patch series? For each of the above, it looks like they are actually version 2, yet they still just say "[PATCH X/Y]" (not "[PATCH v2 X/Y]"). This makes it harder to parse the history of each series. (And the combining of two un-versioned patch series adds to the confusion.) Now, this combined series has a good v2 marking (although at this point, is it really v3? ...whatever, it doesn't matter). Please continue to write appropriate $subjects for this and future patch series. Thanks, Brian