From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753619Ab3K2SVO (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:21:14 -0500 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:60335 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752088Ab3K2SVN (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Nov 2013 13:21:13 -0500 Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 18:21:10 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Lee Jones Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Walleij Message-ID: <20131129182110.GH27568@sirena.org.uk> References: <1384859269-19801-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20131129160358.GD26982@lee--X1> <20131129164229.GG27568@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dA3KA1Bq6vhZBZVs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Boycott meat -- suck your thumb. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.92.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] ASoC: dma: ARM: ux500: Obtain DMA data from Device Tree X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --dA3KA1Bq6vhZBZVs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 05:37:30PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > >> Are you/did you already tak(e)ing this set? > > Don't send contentless nags, they're just noise. > Countless. Errr... 1 after 10 days! Contentless means there's no content in the e-mail rather than that it's too soon or something. =20 In general you should either engage with the prior discussion (for example here by asking where the patches are if they've not appeared as expected and/or sending the patches you were asked to send) or resend patches if there was no response at all (since if patches have been dropped there's a good chance people don't have them any more). > > Looking at my sent mail folder I see: > > | I'm happy to merge the first few patches if that's easiest for everyo= ne > > | else, let me know and send them to me if that's what works for people. > > which doesn't seem to have happened. > I'm confused. Why do you want them to be resent? You only sent me the ASoC portion of the series, I didn't get the arch/arm bits since you didn't copy me on them. I assumed those were the patches you were taking about. > What about the patches which are not in the 'first few'? > I took a look at asoc/topic/ux500, which was mentioned in the same > reply, but they don't appear to be there? Am I looking at a different tre= e? Repushed now. There was one patch I asked for updates to and which (as I said) I guess probably depends on the patches you didn't send me. --dA3KA1Bq6vhZBZVs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSmNsTAAoJELSic+t+oim9SeUQAI1RsDYtfTRbIxY/PpA9DbNN I0dCTrk69GmjvnZLUWgsaz95oJfwh+8Tg1pZnPFa2PVO7W+o9gKpu0qxTwlfs3o5 CI23kfK+tS4wD+Z2iGcdKN3dl5CjmUhUWFLQLGOU7xKKUpCAYBRbbaDjxUxQpwsC BiXLVH6eqzR/Qci/IHBX++D9RJCFneXuuLwVNK7zEsIBAgJ51vF6TqS+ac6gIyw/ hNKmj7x3tBgkRWxdrYlSPv9id43dEJILnLBzjs0faSD1Azu6KTek6fcN3QqQjPE8 n6am4gJgwRu3euQuvaIO2IZ8Pnktw4C4WYRa/MLaREVwKjbWyvgLQWuC0wQrW82n zL0mcqrKqyMKYbTiNNF5SDy8YD9y6gguUKfYr/RGGs/mtyb8xUgmGTkYKEFiD6zI kczfK5LJ48hlL2h0LPkz//CLpwTaySEEmNi6bkhL2noChgvFoVSQ9xMfj+ZOosof qVB9Kqrddb2QwZmNvWVPvwJH2MVsYgm32hXKdRPj3f/xjdS970QkYii/TdAdONn4 ZkCcdxWEAyzStqPwyMbSq/OYkd4pmV9w4NJhKFyf/ECBtBFvZH/YYS7btHi+uGjk 4VFGQFn5Rrq0I5JXqUZerRsa72g7NEKXWKL6KStLm4kfVEDpw/SAWzxNTbDVgDHK fxROzAo/kuWEmqj/8tgJ =H53w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dA3KA1Bq6vhZBZVs--