From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753235Ab3LBSse (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Dec 2013 13:48:34 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:52934 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751041Ab3LBSsc (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Dec 2013 13:48:32 -0500 Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:48:29 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20131202.134829.2041194874847967680.davem@davemloft.net> To: mchan@broadcom.com Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, bhelgaas@google.com, nsujir@broadcom.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI / tg3: Give up chip reset and carrier loss handling if PCI device is not present From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1385930359.6988.7.camel@LTIRV-MCHAN1.corp.ad.broadcom.com> References: <7807315.7cU9KldDtM@vostro.rjw.lan> <1385930359.6988.7.camel@LTIRV-MCHAN1.corp.ad.broadcom.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.1 (shards.monkeyblade.net [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 02 Dec 2013 10:48:32 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Michael Chan" Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 12:39:19 -0800 > I'm not familiar with the DS1. Does the tg3 device get removed through > tg3_remove_one() in this case? What happens when you reconnect the DS1? Michael, is Rafael's explanation sufficient for you?