From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754175Ab3LBWWM (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:22:12 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:47298 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752739Ab3LBWWK (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:22:10 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: NTX7grvXr8K3eFGR0os79HiN1rD2gM+x+o9pgnj91Sk1 1386022928 Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 14:22:08 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Russell King - ARM Linux , Pablo Neira Ayuso , Sasha Levin , Patrick McHardy , kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, "David S. Miller" , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: netfilter: active obj WARN when cleaning up Message-ID: <20131202222208.GB13034@kroah.com> References: <20131127233415.GB19270@kroah.com> <00000142b4282aaf-913f5e4c-314c-4351-9d24-615e66928157-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20131202164039.GA19937@kroah.com> <00000142b4514eb5-2e8f675d-0ecc-423b-9906-58c5f383089b-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20131202172615.GA4722@kroah.com> <00000142b4aeca89-186fc179-92b8-492f-956c-38a7c196d187-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20131202190814.GA2267@kroah.com> <00000142b4d4360c-5755af87-b9b0-4847-b5fa-7a9dd13b49c5-000000@email.amazonses.com> <20131202212235.GA1297@kroah.com> <00000142b54f6694-c51e81b1-f1a2-483b-a1ce-a2d4cb6b155c-000000@email.amazonses.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00000142b54f6694-c51e81b1-f1a2-483b-a1ce-a2d4cb6b155c-000000@email.amazonses.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 09:55:49PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter > > > > That looks good, if you fix the indentation issue :) > > Huh? Your release function had 2 tabs for the lines, not one. > > > Index: linux/include/linux/slub_def.h > > > =================================================================== > > > --- linux.orig/include/linux/slub_def.h 2013-12-02 13:31:07.395905824 -0600 > > > +++ linux/include/linux/slub_def.h 2013-12-02 13:31:07.385906101 -0600 > > > @@ -98,4 +98,8 @@ struct kmem_cache { > > > struct kmem_cache_node *node[MAX_NUMNODES]; > > > }; > > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS > > > +#define SLAB_SUPPORTS_SYSFS > > > > Why even define this? Why not just use CONFIG_SYSFS? > > Because not all slab allocators currently support SYSFS and there is the > need to have different code now in slab_common.c depending on the > configuration of the allocator. But you are defining something that you only ever check once, why not just use CONFIG_SYSFS instead as it makes more sense, not the other way around. thanks, greg k-h