From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753003Ab3LCKki (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2013 05:40:38 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:15301 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752842Ab3LCKkf (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2013 05:40:35 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,817,1378882800"; d="scan'208";a="445940312" Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 12:39:50 +0200 From: Heikki Krogerus To: Felipe Balbi , Roger Quadros Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rob.herring@calxeda.com, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, swarren@wwwdotorg.org, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, rob@landley.net, bcousson@baylibre.com, tony@atomide.com, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, grant.likely@linaro.org, s.nawrocki@samsung.com, galak@codeaurora.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] usb: dwc3: get "usb_phy" only if the platform indicates the presence of PHY's Message-ID: <20131203103950.GB26423@xps8300> References: <1381866857-3861-1-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <1381866857-3861-2-git-send-email-kishon@ti.com> <525E8E93.9010503@ti.com> <525E9046.3090209@ti.com> <525E943E.3080706@ti.com> <20131017145425.GE11611@gimli> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131017145425.GE11611@gimli> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 09:54:26AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 04:27:26PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: > > On 10/16/2013 04:10 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > > Do you know if there are users of dwc3 other than exynos5250 and omap5? > > If not, we should get rid of the old USB PHY altogether. > > Intel's Baytrail, at least. But they don't use DT. I don't see any use for the generic-phy when the device is enumerated from PCI. If dwc3 can live without phys, there should not be any problem dropping the old USB PHY support. Br, -- heikki