mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, jmorris@namei.org
Cc: keyrings@linux-nfs.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][PATCH0/5] Keys patches
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 14:52:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131203145250.30689.28039.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)


Hi Linus, James,

Here are some fixes for the new keyring stuff.  They break down into three
sets:

 (1) A patch to error handling in the big_key type for huge payloads.  If the
     payload is larger than the "low limit" and the backing store allocation
     fails, then big_key_instantiate() doesn't clear the payload pointers in
     the key, assuming them to have been previously cleared - but only one of
     them is.

     Unfortunately, the garbage collector still calls big_key_destroy() when
     sees one of the pointers with a weird value in it (and not NULL) which it
     then tries to clean up.

 (2) Three patches to fix the keyring type:

     (a) A patch to fix the hash function to correctly divide keyrings off from
     keys in the topology of the tree inside the associative array.  This is
     only a problem if searching through nested keyrings - and only if the hash
     function incorrectly puts the a keyring outside of the 0 branch of the
     root node.

     (b) A patch to fix keyrings' use of the associative array.  The
     __key_link_begin() function initially passes a NULL key pointer to
     assoc_array_insert() on the basis that it's holding a place in the tree
     whilst it does more allocation and stuff.

     This is only a problem when a node contains 16 keys that match at that
     level and we want to add an also matching 17th.  This should easily be
     manufactured with a keyring full of keyrings (without chucking any other
     sort of key into the mix) - except for (a) above which makes it on average
     adding the 65th keyring.

     (c) A patch to fix searching down through nested keyrings, where any
     keyring in the set has more than 16 keyrings and none of the first
     keyrings we look through has a match (before the tree iteration needs to
     step to a more distal node).

 (3) A patch to fix the big_key type's use of a shmem file as its backing store
     causing audit messages and LSM check failures.  This is done by setting
     S_PRIVATE on the file to avoid LSM checks on the file (access to the shmem
     file goes through the keyctl() interface and so is gated by the LSM that
     way).

     This isn't normally a problem if a key is used by the context that
     generated it - and it's currently only used by libkrb5.

David
---
David Howells (4):
      KEYS: Pre-clear struct key on allocation
      KEYS: Fix the keyring hash function
      KEYS: Fix multiple key add into associative array
      KEYS: Fix searching of nested keyrings

Eric Paris (1):
      security: shmem: implement kernel private shmem inodes


 Documentation/assoc_array.txt |    6 +++---
 include/linux/assoc_array.h   |    6 +++---
 include/linux/shmem_fs.h      |    2 ++
 lib/assoc_array.c             |    4 ++--
 mm/shmem.c                    |   36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 security/keys/big_key.c       |    2 +-
 security/keys/key.c           |    8 +-------
 security/keys/keyring.c       |   17 ++++++++---------
 8 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)


             reply	other threads:[~2013-12-03 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-03 14:52 David Howells [this message]
2013-12-03 14:52 ` [PATCH1/5] KEYS: Pre-clear struct key on allocation David Howells
2013-12-03 14:53 ` [PATCH2/5] KEYS: Fix the keyring hash function David Howells
2013-12-03 14:53 ` [PATCH3/5] KEYS: Fix multiple key add into associative array David Howells
2013-12-03 14:53 ` [PATCH4/5] KEYS: Fix searching of nested keyrings David Howells
2013-12-03 14:53 ` [PATCH5/5] security: shmem: implement kernel private shmem inodes David Howells
2013-12-03 16:21 ` [RFC][PATCH0/5] Keys patches David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131203145250.30689.28039.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keyrings@linux-nfs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®