From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754792Ab3LCR71 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2013 12:59:27 -0500 Received: from cassiel.sirena.org.uk ([80.68.93.111]:50411 "EHLO cassiel.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754683Ab3LCR7Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Dec 2013 12:59:25 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 17:59:08 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Hanjun Guo Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Russell King - ARM Linux , Daniel Lezcano , Mark Rutland , Matthew Garrett , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Graeme Gregory , patches@linaro.org, Olof Johansson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Grant Likely , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Message-ID: <20131203175908.GH27568@sirena.org.uk> References: <1386088611-2801-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1386088611-2801-3-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pn37QocMfltEWxia" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1386088611-2801-3-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> X-Cookie: Boycott meat -- suck your thumb. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.92.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [RFC part1 PATCH 2/7] ARM64 : Add dummy asm/cpu.h X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:57:07 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on cassiel.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --pn37QocMfltEWxia Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:36:46AM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote: > ACPI requires a cpu.h, add a dummy one copied from arm. This will need > updated or replaced as ACPI based cpu hotplug for armv8 is worked out. We're going to need the same thing for CPU topology, I've got a similar addition as part of a series to introduce that (which is going to want an ACPI back end at some point I guess) at which point it'll stop being a dummy. I should be posting this week all being well. --pn37QocMfltEWxia Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSnhvpAAoJELSic+t+oim9XrwP/27B9eW5D6QqKsmBzm5lQmm9 H18D4MTDoFBz1xzNA5nU4vNZN+MUQ7dHL1Kbk9RETceGt9BBCV/hhJvv52vJNZnJ Dc4lC4I5Gb31fleohVehC3hK2yDzm3/m9+PyAf1N3jr9mftmJzpwh7p+XjvZujmq DQSElx/GWNTbLEBjXKQhfjP1Z0AlD7VgDI4kxY3VAc7oymurfCOCvcJUESBYoukx SCF4cxESaMVsSCLXHCaN478bf6xwapnAO7pv2vmy6q6UzVl0900UlHxrDoxPixZy ynzrknTyQSuc3uMEeN5w+vEP8Shkja3jLnnRX49VDmL4kPFx3Hz/94s6ZRgvlK+C qnRhuaSrBR1Cuo5j/M5QgoCRT+oDHRMoru+4u9gqDjCU37C1GG48glCPU4fEAViO ktdVOLbSIo5e3tp61K22z7ObVi32fqop7yzQem4yaYUherbp2cO51LeYXZpLLC8f E6eqUl3Z9nLpjM9ipyp/CaEKv2geAV9u6O0DjwCNycH6QfEf44XieikQSIZ/cH9X ew7VM+HYORICYH1pCMiA/HYqt5b+dPQ+NOVSeGzb5aK7/y7+6g72vjXZC65C0Krq KcG/hKB98XJvXy4dLO8H8C+uXE3qw3OzAQiAW7OAJha1GDn+d3fs4WOg/HQZW01d m1XYhz/WN173z4vfw8cN =U12+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pn37QocMfltEWxia--