From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932601Ab3LEDix (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:38:53 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:64589 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752620Ab3LEDiu (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:38:50 -0500 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [RFC part1 PATCH 5/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce arm_core.c and its related head file Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 04:38:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.8.0-22-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Hanjun Guo , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "Russell King - ARM Linux" , Daniel Lezcano , Mark Rutland , Matthew Garrett , linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, Graeme Gregory , Al Stone , patches@linaro.org, Linus Walleij , Olof Johansson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Jon Masters , Grant Likely , Bjorn Helgaas References: <1386088611-2801-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> <1386088611-2801-6-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <1386088611-2801-6-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201312050438.05117.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:vmIyr1JDoVe0wwp2cT3VS0TBzw4hbxun/3uQ1uE/B/M tgK4UACrwVfDwXaZSoopDSI9GGXTIh+Yc958d2fM16sNnqiWwB fBbEYaECTjOOkXPNzhXQXUs0XhcgL8XtNTvmuYwJFayIIf5oPE lXv3qiIZq3YFV9B+4Oao5TcyOXSMolL+jUzaBKggJQcUN6jkZa od7Fr5wpdP76pLqijGVc3pEapV/mgfZWQarKHsSQODEdiRKpRk L0OaSHE62p9CxT6i+0gq3ot3U55M+vAS7S/lULA6PEOJu8TVUu f9jz74CSTZcKUzsvTbUpVFfkxDjkaD0p7WSzBMwYPPYjb2/HXO zQ+csaH0DMIHVd6e/PYQ= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 03 December 2013, Hanjun Guo wrote: > +static unsigned int gsi_to_irq(unsigned int gsi) > +{ > + int irq = irq_create_mapping(NULL, gsi); > + > + return irq; > +} I think this could use a comment regarding your plans for IRQ domains. Do you expect that all ACPI systems would have only a single GIC IRQ controller and a single domain, or do you plan to add irqdomain code later? Arnd