From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932390Ab3LENvv (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:51:51 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.225]:64196 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932203Ab3LENvu (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:51:50 -0500 Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:51:46 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Henrik Austad , "Paul E. McKenney" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, darren@dvhart.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, sbw@mit.edu, David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 tip/core/locking 0/4] Memory-barrier documentation updates Message-ID: <20131205085146.0370ea2a@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20131205122851.GB20562@gmail.com> References: <20131204224628.GA30159@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20131205105928.GA27382@austad.us> <20131205122851.GB20562@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.118:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:28:51 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Just me, or is the 3rd patch missing from lkml? > > It had a Cc: list from hell so vger probably rejected it as spam. > I wish vger wouldn't do that. I wonder how much spam is really flagged by this one characteristic alone. That is, spam that would have made it otherwise, but because of the Cc list, it was rejected. -- Steve