From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754957Ab3LIGWF (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2013 01:22:05 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:43794 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760758Ab3LIGVs (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Dec 2013 01:21:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1386153162-11225-11-git-send-email-khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com From: Michael Ellerman Cc: mikey@neuling.org, ak@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com, acme@ghostprotocols.net, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mingo@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 10/10] powerpc, perf: Cleanup SW branch filter list look up Message-Id: <20131209062147.B874D2C00C6@ozlabs.org> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 17:21:47 +1100 (EST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-04-12 at 10:32:42 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > This patch adds enumeration for all available SW branch filters > in powerpc book3s code and also streamlines the look for the > SW branch filter entries while trying to figure out which all > branch filters can be supported in SW. This appears to patch code that was only added in 8/10 ? Was there any reason not to do it the right way from the beginning? cheers