mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, microcode: Do Intel microcode revision check signed
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:55:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131210155533.GI21717@two.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131210153000.GA3804@phenom.dumpdata.com>

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:30:00AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:04:02PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > The Intel SDM Vol 3 9.11.1 Microcode update states that
> > the update revision field is signed. However we do the comparison
> > unsigned, as the comparison gets promoted.
> > 
> > Use a cast to really do a signed comparison of the microcode
> > revision.
> 
> Why not just update the struct?

It would need updating various printks I think. So I chose the simpler cast,
as that already solves the comparison problem.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-10 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-06 21:04 Andi Kleen
2013-12-06 21:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, microcode: Add option to allow downgrading of microcode Andi Kleen
2013-12-13 21:00   ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2013-12-15  0:40     ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2013-12-10 15:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, microcode: Do Intel microcode revision check signed Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-12-10 15:55   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2013-12-10 17:09     ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131210155533.GI21717@two.firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome