From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"patches@linaro.org" <patches@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>,
"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Subject: Re: [Linaro-acpi] [RFC part1 PATCH 1/7] ACPI: Make ACPI core running without PCI on ARM64
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:22:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131210192217.GI11468@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201312100428.52588.arnd@arndb.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1431 bytes --]
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 04:28:52AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 09 December 2013, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > People are trying to deploy ACPI-based embedded x86, and most of the
> > ACPI/DT integration discussion seems to have been based on the idea that
> > this is a worthwhile thing to support. If we're not interested in doing
> > so then we should probably make that a whole kernel decision rather than
> > a per architecture one.
> Well, except it's not an architecture independent decision. An embedded
> x86 SoC will still be very much like a PC, just with a few things added
> in and some other bits left out, and you can already describe it mostly
It's not just the SoC, it's also the rest of the board. The patches the
Intel guys are submitting at the minute are mainly for the off-SoC
devices at least as far as I noticed. This'll impact anyone who ends up
using ACPI, we need to at least pay attention to what's going on there.
> with plain ACPI-5.0. Also, there are only a couple of different non-PC style
> devices that Intel is integrating into their SoCs, so we're talking
> about a few dozen device drivers here.
It's going to be way more than that for the whole system, and you can't
assume that all the system integrators are going to pay a blind bit of
notice to the reference designs. Some will just clone them but others
will bin them and do their own thing.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-10 19:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-03 16:36 [RFC part1 PATCH 0/7] Make ACPI core running " Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:36 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 1/7] ACPI: Make ACPI core running without PCI " Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:41 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-12-04 14:08 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-05 22:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-06 15:04 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Tomasz Nowicki
2013-12-06 17:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-09 4:12 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-09 11:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-12-09 13:05 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-09 16:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-09 16:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-12-09 17:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-09 18:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-12-16 20:51 ` Graeme Gregory
2013-12-17 11:29 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-12-19 11:30 ` Graeme Gregory
2013-12-19 14:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-19 15:43 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-12-20 19:55 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-10 2:53 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-09 17:06 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-12-10 1:52 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-10 3:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-10 19:22 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2013-12-10 20:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-10 20:23 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-11 3:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-11 11:02 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-10 9:56 ` Linus Walleij
2013-12-09 23:34 ` Rob Herring
2013-12-03 16:47 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2013-12-04 14:15 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:36 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 2/7] ARM64 : Add dummy asm/cpu.h Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 17:13 ` Mark Rutland
2013-12-04 15:00 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 17:59 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-03 16:36 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 3/7] ACPI / processor_core: Rework _PDC related stuff to make it more arch-independent Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:46 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-12-04 14:11 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:51 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2013-12-03 17:02 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-12-04 14:16 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:36 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 4/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce the skeleton of _PDC related for ARM64 Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:53 ` One Thousand Gnomes
2013-12-04 14:17 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 17:12 ` Rob Herring
2013-12-04 14:30 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:36 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 5/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce arm_core.c and its related head file Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 18:03 ` Mark Rutland
2013-12-04 15:48 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-04 5:46 ` Zheng, Lv
2013-12-04 15:53 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-04 19:47 ` Al Stone
2013-12-05 3:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-05 13:51 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-05 20:40 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-05 14:09 ` Rob Herring
2013-12-05 14:27 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:36 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 6/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Introduce lowlevel suspend function Hanjun Guo
2013-12-03 16:36 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 7/7] ARM64 / ACPI: Enable ARM64 in Kconfig Hanjun Guo
2013-12-04 10:10 ` Graeme Gregory
2013-12-04 15:55 ` Hanjun Guo
2013-12-05 22:25 ` [RFC part1 PATCH 0/7] Make ACPI core running on ARM64 Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-06 13:58 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-08 2:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-08 19:40 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-10 9:45 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131210192217.GI11468@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®