From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751721Ab3LLOzg (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:55:36 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.225]:35164 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751374Ab3LLOzf (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:55:35 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:55:33 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Paul Gortmaker Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Christoph Hellwig , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , "Paul E. McKenney" , Andrew Morton , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] wait-simple: Introduce the simple waitqueue implementation Message-ID: <20131212095533.1fab411f@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <52A9CCA6.6040806@windriver.com> References: <1386810399-8973-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <1386810399-8973-2-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <20131212080314.GA25783@infradead.org> <52A9CCA6.6040806@windriver.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.142:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 09:48:06 -0500 Paul Gortmaker wrote: > 1) git mv wait.[ch] --- > cwait.[ch] > make an empty wait.h include cwait.h temporarily > > 2) rename all existing functions in cwait.[ch] to have an added > "c" prefix (or similar) > > in wait.h, temporarily add a bunch of things like > #define wait_xyz cwait_xyz > so that things still compile and link. What about instead change all users of wait_*() to cwait_*(). Then the next steps would be to skip 3 and jump right to 4) > > 3) track down the users who really need the extra complexity > and have them use cwait calls and include cwait.h > > 4) bring in the simple wait queue support as wait.c and wait.h > and delete the defines added in step two. This will be the > flag day commit. Not a flag day commit, as no one is using it. Then start converting all users back to the wait_*() functions one at a time. If something breaks, we know which one it was. -- Steve > > Is that what we want to do here? >