From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751751Ab3LLLqw (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 06:46:52 -0500 Received: from cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com ([217.140.96.50]:33808 "EHLO cam-admin0.cambridge.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751469Ab3LLLqv (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 06:46:51 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:46:10 +0000 From: Will Deacon To: Vinayak Kale Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "patches@apm.com" , "jcm@redhat.com" , "sboyd@codeaurora.org" , Marc Zyngier , Tuan Phan Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/2] arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt Message-ID: <20131212114610.GA23971@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> References: <1386151791-4881-1-git-send-email-vkale@apm.com> <1386151791-4881-3-git-send-email-vkale@apm.com> <20131209165003.GJ13908@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:33:59AM +0000, Vinayak Kale wrote: > > Below fixup works fine on APM platform. > > Do you want me to send this fixup as part of next revision of the > > patch or will you apply it yourself? (For later case, you have my ack) > > Any comments? Do I need to send the fix-up in next revision of patch? Looks fine to me; I've folded in my changes and applied it to my aarch64 branch. I'll queue it for 3.14 when Catalin and I start putting that together. Will