From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751686Ab3LLLuM (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 06:50:12 -0500 Received: from mail-ig0-f178.google.com ([209.85.213.178]:44354 "EHLO mail-ig0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751527Ab3LLLuJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Dec 2013 06:50:09 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 1878 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 06:50:09 EST Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 06:50:03 -0500 From: Matt Porter To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Felipe Balbi , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Kumar Gala , Ian Campbell , Christian Daudt , Paul Zimmerman , Devicetree List , Kamil Debski , Linaro Patches , Tomasz Figa , Linux USB List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kyungmin Park , Linux ARM Kernel List Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] phy: add phy_get_bus_width()/phy_set_bus_width() calls Message-ID: <20131212115003.GB20773@beef> References: <1386847117-21240-1-git-send-email-mporter@linaro.org> <1386847117-21240-2-git-send-email-mporter@linaro.org> <20131212112715.GK4360@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131212112715.GK4360@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 11:27:15AM +0000, Russell King wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:18:29AM -0500, Matt Porter wrote: > > /** > > + * struct phy_attrs - represents phy attributes > > + * @bus_width: Data path width implemented by PHY > > + */ > > +struct phy_attrs { > > + u32 bus_width; > > Why u32? Kishon suggested it and I changed it on this rev...forgetting about the error path below. > > int phy_power_off(struct phy *phy); > > +static inline u32 phy_get_bus_width(struct phy *phy) > > +{ > > + return phy->attrs.bus_width; > ... > > > > +static inline u32 phy_get_bus_width(struct phy *phy) > > +{ > > + return -ENOSYS; > > Why u32, especially as you're returning a negative number here. > > If the bus width is a small integer (I'm assuming you don't have up to > 2^30 bus signals) then what's wrong with it being an 'int' ? Yes, very correct...it's expected to always be a small positive integer value or zero (when not populated as it's optional). I agree it should go back to 'int' especially due to the negative value when GENERIC_PHY isn't enabled. -Matt