From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752664Ab3LMLQl (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 06:16:41 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:54606 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752211Ab3LMLQk (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 06:16:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 03:16:39 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Dave Chinner Cc: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel , xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: XFS / writeback invoking soft lockup. Message-ID: <20131213111639.GD23546@infradead.org> References: <20131213071407.GA6527@redhat.com> <20131213104853.GS10988@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131213104853.GS10988@dastard> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 09:48:53PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > All I can say is that there doesn't look to be any obvious signs > that this is a XFS or writeback problem fom the stack trace, and > without more information or a reproducable test case I'm not going > to be able to understand the cause. > > Is the problem reproducable, or is it just a one-off? If it's reproducable it would be good to enable the xfs_writepage tracepoint and get a trace-cmd log of it.