From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753389Ab3LMUiI (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:38:08 -0500 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:5240 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753065Ab3LMUiH (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Dec 2013 15:38:07 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,481,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="424404699" Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 12:38:06 -0800 From: Andi Kleen To: Vince Weaver Cc: mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [tip:perf/core] perf: Add generic transaction flags Message-ID: <20131213203806.GR22695@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <1379688044-14173-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > I know this is a bit late, but isn't this patch missing something like > (not a real patch): > > > * { u64 weight; } && PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT > * { u64 data_src; } && PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC > + * { u64 transaction; } && PERF_SAMPLE_TRANSACTION > * }; > */ Yes it should have that. Thanks for catching. Please send a real patch. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only