From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754126Ab3LPO0K (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:26:10 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:42381 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753817Ab3LPO0I (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:26:08 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,495,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="445014487" From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: Jianguo Wu Cc: Andrew Morton , kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, Naoya Horiguchi , Mel Gorman , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qiuxishi , Hanjun Guo In-Reply-To: <52AEC8FD.6050200@huawei.com> References: <52AEC8FD.6050200@huawei.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: check for pte NULL pointer in __page_check_address() Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20131216142513.784A8E0090@blue.fi.intel.com> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 16:25:13 +0200 (EET) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jianguo Wu wrote: > In __page_check_address(), if address's pud is not present, > huge_pte_offset() will return NULL, we should check the return value. > > Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu Looks okay to me. Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Have you triggered a crash there? Or just spotted by reading the code? -- Kirill A. Shutemov