From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755182Ab3LPRUb (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:20:31 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:45501 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754965Ab3LPRUa (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:20:30 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,496,1384329600"; d="scan'208";a="425473535" Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 09:20:29 -0800 From: Andi Kleen To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Pravin B Shelar , "Kirill A. Shutemov" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/7] mm: print more details for bad_page() Message-ID: <20131216172029.GY22695@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20131213235903.8236C539@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20131213235904.D69C09F7@viggo.jf.intel.com> <00000142fc5326bf-37eaf439-1c10-448f-9cd3-8137290680ca-000000@email.amazonses.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00000142fc5326bf-37eaf439-1c10-448f-9cd3-8137290680ca-000000@email.amazonses.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 04:52:57PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 13 Dec 2013, Dave Hansen wrote: > > > This way, the messages will show specifically why the page was > > bad, *specifically* which flags it is complaining about, if it > > was a page flag combination which was the problem. > > Yes this would have been helpful in the past for me. Yes, for me too. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only