From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755110Ab3LRRHF (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 12:07:05 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:54908 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754998Ab3LRRHA (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 12:07:00 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 12:06:55 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20131218.120655.881363015739010955.davem@davemloft.net> To: peterz@infradead.org Cc: geert@linux-m68k.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ffusco@redhat.com, dborkman@redhat.com, tgraf@redhat.com Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20131218101523.GP13532@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20131217.213033.1019416869378407851.davem@davemloft.net> <20131218101523.GP13532@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.1 (shards.monkeyblade.net [0.0.0.0]); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 09:07:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:15:23 +0100 > So unless there's a sane and easy way to keep it sorted; I'm going to > ignore that rule. Me too, it's unreasonable and of dubious value.