From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755046Ab3LRQon (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:44:43 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59074 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752031Ab3LRQol (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 11:44:41 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:44:38 +0100 From: Jan Kara To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jan Kara , Jens Axboe , LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Use lockless lists for smp_call_function_single() Message-ID: <20131218164438.GA31692@quack.suse.cz> References: <1387380302-29552-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <20131218153644.GA16049@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131218153644.GA16049@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 18-12-13 07:36:44, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 04:24:59PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > Hello, > > > > these three patches make smp_call_function_single() use lockless lists and > > cleanup abuse of csd.list in the block layer. I have some use for lockless > > smp_call_function_single() in printk code and that's why I've picked up > > Christoph's patch. Jens, can you have a look at the series please? > > seconded. Also I think your two cleanups should go before my patch. Fair enough, I'll reorder the patches in the series and resend. > I'll also dust up my other patch to use __smp_call_function_single > directly in the block layer once we make progress on these. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR