From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754600Ab3LSRuu (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:50:50 -0500 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:30287 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751231Ab3LSRus (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:50:48 -0500 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 108.39.110.144 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18R0NE0O90jWOD0AMEzXdEi6eBx97vppCE= X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.1 titan 69ECD4F7462 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:50:17 -0500 From: Jason Cooper To: Arnaud Ebalard Cc: Mark Rutland , Stephen Rothwell , Ian Campbell , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Pawel Moll , Alessandro Zummo , Linus Walleij , Stephen Warren , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Jason Gunthorpe , Mark Brown , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rob Landley , Kumar Gala , Grant Likely , Peter Huewe , Andrew Morton , Thierry Reding , Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem? Message-ID: <20131219175017.GW2609@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <87siton6ke.fsf@natisbad.org> <20131219164624.GV2609@titan.lakedaemon.net> <87sitoka39.fsf@natisbad.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sitoka39.fsf@natisbad.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 06:46:18PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: > Jason Cooper writes: > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 05:34:09PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: ... > >> I wonder if someone (Andrew? Stephen? Jason?) would be kind enough to > >> take care of the v6 I just sent [1]. > > > > I don't mind routing it though mvebu/arm-soc since the only consumers > > are currently mvebu boards, but I'd like to hear from Andrew that this > > is ok. > > I will do what you think is the best. It sounds like once you address Alessandro's concerns about /proc entries, we should be able to take v7 through mvebu/arm-soc. thx, Jason.