From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755230Ab3LSSK2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:10:28 -0500 Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:18896 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754594Ab3LSSKY (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:10:24 -0500 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 108.39.110.144 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1+epzP255w4EiXO1sZ5J26vDjyim/XjajA= X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.0.1 titan AB0E74F74E8 Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:09:40 -0500 From: Jason Cooper To: Arnaud Ebalard Cc: Alessandro Zummo , Mark Rutland , Stephen Rothwell , Pawel Moll , Stephen Warren , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Linus Walleij , Ian Campbell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Jason Gunthorpe , Mark Brown , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Rob Landley , Kumar Gala , Grant Likely , Peter Huewe , Andrew Morton , Thierry Reding , Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: Can someone Ack and queue a patch for RTC subsytem? Message-ID: <20131219180940.GY2609@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <87siton6ke.fsf@natisbad.org> <20131219173857.0a546b99@linux.lan.towertech.it> <87d2kslphr.fsf@natisbad.org> <20131219184024.2a649328@linux.lan.towertech.it> <8761qkk96q.fsf@natisbad.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8761qkk96q.fsf@natisbad.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 07:05:49PM +0100, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: > Hi, > > Alessandro Zummo writes: > > >> Do you want me to send a v7 w/ the .proc helper removed or leave > >> things as they are and Ack the patch as is? > > > > Unless absolutely needed, I'd prefer if you can remove them > > or move to sysfs. > > Well, my helper provides info on control and status registers flags > (just like rtc-isl1208.c does), which are useful mainly for debug I > guess. If this can help pushing things forward, I will send a v7 later > today w/ the .proc helper removed from the patch. Why not convert to debugfs? thx, Jason.