From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422857Ab3LTO2q (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:28:46 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.225]:38105 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030201Ab3LTO2o (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:28:44 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:28:34 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Juri Lelli Cc: Peter Zijlstra , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, claudio@evidence.eu.com, michael@amarulasolutions.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it, nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it, luca.abeni@unitn.it, dhaval.giani@gmail.com, hgu1972@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@linux.it, insop.song@gmail.com, liming.wang@windriver.com, jkacur@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] sched, deadline: patches Message-ID: <20131220092834.15fa2f6d@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <52B44B56.1020903@gmail.com> References: <20131217122720.950475833@infradead.org> <52B44B56.1020903@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.118:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 14:51:18 +0100 Juri Lelli wrote: > > One question; the SoB chain in patch 2/13 seems weird; I suppose that > > patch is a collaborative effort? could we cure that by mentioning Fabio > > and Michael in some other way? > > > > We could change their SoB to be a Cc (not sure this cure the thing anyway). Not > even Cc-ing them seems pointless. Then we have them mentioned in > sched/deadline.c copyright (oh! s/2012/2014/ there :-O). Well, if they were involved in the development of the code, then their SoB's would be appropriate. That copyright seems to state that they are required. -- Steve