From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751989Ab3LTS0P (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:26:15 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.226]:38583 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751296Ab3LTS0O (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:26:14 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:26:11 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Peter Zijlstra , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, oleg@redhat.com, fweisbec@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, johan.eker@ericsson.com, p.faure@akatech.ch, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, claudio@evidence.eu.com, michael@amarulasolutions.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, tommaso.cucinotta@sssup.it, juri.lelli@gmail.com, nicola.manica@disi.unitn.it, luca.abeni@unitn.it, dhaval.giani@gmail.com, hgu1972@gmail.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, raistlin@linux.it, insop.song@gmail.com, liming.wang@windriver.com, jkacur@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] sched: Add bandwidth management for sched_dl Message-ID: <20131220132611.69a1a70d@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20131220132323.524cf2b1@gandalf.local.home> References: <20131217122720.950475833@infradead.org> <20131217123353.180539582@infradead.org> <20131218165508.GB30183@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20131220171343.GL2480@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20131220123707.44fb7192@gandalf.local.home> <20131220174200.GX16438@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20131220132323.524cf2b1@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.130:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 20 Dec 2013 13:23:23 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > > CPU 0 CPU 1 > ----- ----- > sched_setattr() > dl_overflow() > cpus = __dl_span_weight() > > cpu_down() > raw_spin_lock() > raw_spin_lock() /* blocks */ > > > overflow = __dl_overflow(cpus-1); > raw_spin_unlock(); > > /* gets lock */ > __dl_overflow(cpus) /* all OK! */ Forgot to add: /* new deadline commitment added here */ > > > > /* cpus goes to cpus - 1 making > __dl_overflow() not OK anymore */ > also should have stated: "__dl_overflow(cpus-1) not OK anymore" -- Steve