From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752467Ab3LYWjL (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Dec 2013 17:39:11 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:48600 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752294Ab3LYWjJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Dec 2013 17:39:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2013 23:39:07 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Viresh Kumar , Lists linaro-kernel , Patch Tracking , "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Lan Tianyu , Nishanth Menon , jinchoi@broadcom.com, Sebastian Capella , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: suspend/resume governors with PM notifiers Message-ID: <20131225223907.GA13593@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> References: <0e476d16e0ae4b001f5dd4f9ac191f899095928a.1384510171.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> <2235672.LLJc6e6dny@vostro.rjw.lan> <6050176.zVNbf5pomE@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6050176.zVNbf5pomE@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > > Well, disabling it for the whole duration of suspend/resume and/or hibernation > > > may not be the right approach entirely, unless we force the pax perf of the > > > > s/pax/max ? > > Yes. I'm not sure max frequency is a good idea. In particular, early athlon64 notebooks could not run on max frequency on battery power. IMO it would be good to keep governors running during hibernation. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html