From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752862AbaABVCW (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jan 2014 16:02:22 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.225]:6270 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751172AbaABVCU (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jan 2014 16:02:20 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 16:02:18 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Namhyung Kim , Oleg Nesterov , Masami Hiramatsu , Srikar Dronamraju , Hyeoncheol Lee , "zhangwei(Jovi)" , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Hemant Kumar , LKML , Namhyung Kim Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/17] tracing/uprobes: Add support for full argument access methods Message-ID: <20140102160218.6e9ee4a4@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20140102155827.21b552e0@gandalf.local.home> References: <1387168336-13213-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <1387168336-13213-16-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org> <20140102155827.21b552e0@gandalf.local.home> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.130:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 15:58:27 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 13:32:14 +0900 > Namhyung Kim wrote: > > > From: Namhyung Kim > > > > Enable to fetch other types of argument for the uprobes. IOW, we can > > access stack, memory, deref, bitfield and retval from uprobes now. > > > > The format for the argument types are same as kprobes (but @SYMBOL > > type is not supported for uprobes), i.e: > > > > @ADDR : Fetch memory at ADDR > > $stackN : Fetch Nth entry of stack (N >= 0) > > $stack : Fetch stack address > > $retval : Fetch return value > > +|-offs(FETCHARG) : Fetch memory at FETCHARG +|- offs address > > > > Note that the retval only can be used with uretprobes. > > > > Original-patch-by: Hyeoncheol Lee > > Where was the original patch posted? And can we get Hyeoncheol's SOB for > this? > Was this the other part of patch 11? Still should have Hyeoncheol's signed-off-by. If you already had it on the original (before the split) then we can add it here too, as he already signed off on the code that this was based on. -- Steve