Add some nitpicks below.

Reviewed-by: Chen, Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 07:47:24PM -0500, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> +int check_irq_vectors_for_cpu_disable(void)
> +{
> +	int irq, cpu;
> +	unsigned int vector, this_count, count;
> +	struct irq_desc *desc;
> +	struct irq_data *data;
> +	struct cpumask affinity_new, online_new;
> +
> +	cpumask_copy(&online_new, cpu_online_mask);
> +	cpu_clear(smp_processor_id(), online_new);
I notice that you use smp_processor_id() many times. Maybe we can
save it first for speed.

> +
> +	this_count = 0;
> +	for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) {
> +		irq = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]);
> +		if (irq >= 0) {
> +			desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +			data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> +			cpumask_copy(&affinity_new, data->affinity);
> +			cpu_clear(smp_processor_id(), affinity_new);
> +			/*
> +			 * Only count active non-percpu irqs, and those
> +			 * irqs that are not linked to on an online cpu; in
> +			 * fixup_irqs(), chip->irq_set_affinity() will be
> +			 * called which will set vector_irq[irq] for each
> +			 * cpu.
> +			 */
> +			if (irq_has_action(irq) && !irqd_is_per_cpu(data) &&
> +			    (cpumask_empty(&affinity_new) ||
> +			     !cpumask_subset(&affinity_new, &online_new)))
> +				this_count++;
Would you please add some extra comments to describe these two different
conditions that cpumask is empty and non-empty. I feel it is a little bit
sutble and I don't expect I'm confused by myself one day :-).