From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755440AbaAFRAm (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:00:42 -0500 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:47977 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755070AbaAFRAl (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jan 2014 12:00:41 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 17:00:28 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: David Howells Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Laxman Dewangan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20140106170028.GJ31886@sirena.org.uk> References: <20140106124225.GQ31886@sirena.org.uk> <20140103160755.8153.81654.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <13465.1389026428@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Xzwv1pm7hH1NAiSK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <13465.1389026428@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Cookie: Go climb a gravity well! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 94.175.92.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] Fix up a pointer-integer size mismatch warning in tps62360_probe() X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Xzwv1pm7hH1NAiSK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 04:40:28PM +0000, David Howells wrote: > Mark Brown wrote: > > you need to CC things to maintainers > warthog>grep -i tps6 MAINTAINERS=20 > warthog1> > I cc'd Laxman who is the only person mentioned in the file. > I cc'd you who is mentioned in the "regulator" section and who appears in > sign-offs in the log. But you didn't CC Liam who comaintains the subsystem and for me you used a random address from signoffs on old commits (which you will doubtless have noticed bounces) rather than the address in MAINTAINERS. It looks awfully like you only used signoffs here... > There is no "regulator" list in the MAINTAINERS file. Right, lkml is fine there - IIRC that was prompted by another patch I noticed in the series, or it could just have been part of the boilerplate response for these things. --Xzwv1pm7hH1NAiSK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSyuEoAAoJELSic+t+oim91D8P/37cyctgI+Jzva4hycLseYg1 uLn0QHL6b59ywbB7SeirmiD2hanNU22/LdOaAqVHVNXjxqHZQD8rUQbyJhXOTl8i rZ1wrA3a/42rgWVxZct4uWE6grJRVOBhVkluHexnc4q8twICv3XP3sy8va8mEC8G TQV2Q4SpRvm/XzuT7Kpa2ERSGuqU8gs7gDFSLxVUzCovPN0x/cfq8DyA0PFmsJHO nMHXNG+/5LQtWn0y5MJHMTl/+6SNNH6UHnYR/zhcUNhwCH3yWA/oYtKw1zkWkela HdUo2qFW3Q5gjxHjpeMETFO/MlPG3VLlZTWHkGS4/SJf8c8P7Nnzoec4qmy5/nBn 7JaWoC8g4zlf6zv28uUAoDIykR46VQYtSIc4CMT4ESg0fYq+xbbNbwwKQp1qjGoK RZILQtn5F3BjY4ql7mmbPxFSRQbGzC+Dp5uPg9tgxEvOdoTXZoXIoiOVNvVso8FA bPoRAbX55a56lFJUgdyQOuNgLhYRFcxtfpIiLWoEIIwpYErv/GLIDNXREWNO5kNM J33m46snItZ/6b/+NzGls9lcE0c+BSgacA8qnVK+5wMZrkYD8wZNDlPszxBOJ+Ho ovSV5ovP2z84dCqmROa+So/vULKSSQnGZZ0BC2u/kBBU6M8kSlQgT7eYeDveUsod tu+ylxDL0KtNN5xiXGIs =+dYo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Xzwv1pm7hH1NAiSK--