From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757191AbaAHTS4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jan 2014 14:18:56 -0500 Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:59159 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751008AbaAHTSw (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jan 2014 14:18:52 -0500 X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 99.127.230.128 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX18KCwEVD0x/fhyuF8YEV7g0 Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:18:47 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren To: Nishanth Menon Cc: Rob Herring , Benoit Cousson , Mark Rutland , dt list , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , Stephen Warren , lkml , Rob Landley , linux-omap , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+/dts: standardize SoC naming Message-ID: <20140108191846.GE31323@atomide.com> References: <1386204578-6018-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Nishanth Menon [140106 16:49]: > Hi Benoit, Tony, > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > Originally attempted partially in [1], the missing binding were > > reported as part of Rob's report in [2]. > > Would you like me to send this series again since I do not see this in: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git/log/?h=for_3.14/dts No need to and sorry for the delays. I'm applying these into omap-for-v3.14/fixes-not-urgent as they should not conflict with other DT related patches. Regards, Tony > patchwork links: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3286051/ > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3286061/ > > > > > So, here is take two of the series, lacking an standard causes issues > > that was fixed such as [3]. Ideally, we should never again introduce a > > board file without a exact compatible SoC match. > > > > I have stayed a bit away from updating board and SoC dts files yet > > to look at the direction we'd like to go here. If we feel things are > > good, I would gladly try to clean our mess up. > > > > Nishanth Menon (2): > > Documentation: dt: OMAP: explicitly state SoC compatible strings > > ARM: OMAP2+: board-generic: update SoC compatibility strings > > > > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/omap/omap.txt | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c | 7 +++ > > 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+) > > > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2998201/ > > [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138378029113665&w=2 > > [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3279281/ > > > > -- > > 1.7.9.5 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel