From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753416AbaAKUgu (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:36:50 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:38574 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751274AbaAKUgr (ORCPT ); Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:36:47 -0500 Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:36:51 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Monam Agarwal Cc: bergwolf@gmail.com, andreas.dilger@intel.com, keith.mannthey@intel.com, oleg.drokin@intel.com, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] Staging: lustre: Fix return does not need parantheses Message-ID: <20140111203651.GB6501@kroah.com> References: <1389470502-26243-1-git-send-email-monamagarwal123@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1389470502-26243-1-git-send-email-monamagarwal123@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 01:31:41AM +0530, Monam Agarwal wrote: > The patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl error in > lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c > ERROR: return is not a function, parentheses are not required > > Signed-off-by: Monam Agarwal I'm totally confused here. You have multiple series of patches, sent with different version numbers, some with the same subjects, and some not. I've deleted all of your lustre patches from my queue because of this, I don't want to apply something incorrectly. Please step back, take a day, and resend all of your pending patches that I have not applied for the lustre code, in a single series, so I know what I should be looking at here. There's no rush, so please take your time and do your best to keep an overworked maintainer from getting things wrong. thanks, greg k-h