From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752812AbaANFso (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 00:48:44 -0500 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:40947 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751876AbaANFsm (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 00:48:42 -0500 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:48:41 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20140113.214841.1954373583033654604.davem@davemloft.net> To: sfr@canb.auug.org.au Cc: hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20140114164420.d296fbcc4be3a5f126c86069@canb.auug.org.au> References: <52D4C25F.8060804@zytor.com> <20140113.211946.205101073261467184.davem@davemloft.net> <20140114164420.d296fbcc4be3a5f126c86069@canb.auug.org.au> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 24.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Stephen Rothwell Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:44:20 +1100 > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 21:19:46 -0800 (PST) David Miller wrote: >> >> From: "H. Peter Anvin" >> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:51:43 -0800 >> >> > Is there a sensible way we can fix this in either net-next or tip? >> >> I think if I sort the files in net-next the problem will go away, >> if someone can confirm this I'll do it. > > I have attached 2 patches: one for net-next and one for tip/auto-latest > (but should be applicable in the appropriate topic branch). If both are > applied to their respect trees, then I get no conflict when merging the > two trees. Net patch applied, thanks Stephen.