mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH mmotm/next] fanotify: fix corruption preventing startup
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 07:04:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140113060441.GB3837@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1401112245290.4960@eggly.anvils>

On Sat 11-01-14 22:54:15, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Two of my machines couldn't boot mmotm with fanotify enabled:
> 0x40000020 was being or'ed into a group's notification_waitq next
> pointer, with sad results.  It comes from an over-simplification in
> fanotify_merge(): test_event isn't NULL when the loop finds no merge.
  That's a really dumb bug. Thanks for the fix! It looks good, you can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

  I was wondering why I didn't see this problem during my testing.  I was
always running my tests with various debug options enabled (in a hope to
catch more problems ;), in particular with spinlock debugging enabled which
shifted the waitqueue pointers further and the corruption landed in
spinlock debugging fields and never got noticed... Ew :-|

								Honza
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> ---
> Fixes fsnotify-do-not-share-events-between-notification-groups.patch
> 
>  fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c |    9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> --- mmotm/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c	2014-01-10 18:25:01.700448941 -0800
> +++ linux/fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify.c	2014-01-11 22:15:31.580961010 -0800
> @@ -37,16 +37,19 @@ static bool should_merge(struct fsnotify
>  static struct fsnotify_event *fanotify_merge(struct list_head *list,
>  					     struct fsnotify_event *event)
>  {
> -	struct fsnotify_event *test_event = NULL;
> +	struct fsnotify_event *test_event;
> +	bool do_merge = false;
>  
>  	pr_debug("%s: list=%p event=%p\n", __func__, list, event);
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry_reverse(test_event, list, list) {
> -		if (should_merge(test_event, event))
> +		if (should_merge(test_event, event)) {
> +			do_merge = true;
>  			break;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!test_event)
> +	if (!do_merge)
>  		return NULL;
>  
>  	test_event->mask |= event->mask;
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

      reply	other threads:[~2014-01-13  6:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-12  6:54 Hugh Dickins
2014-01-13  6:04 ` Jan Kara [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140113060441.GB3837@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®