From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Marian Marinov <mm@yuhu.biz>
Cc: lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: cgroups aware proc
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:05:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140114100541.GS7572@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52D48BA6.2080701@yuhu.biz>
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 02:58:14AM +0200, Marian Marinov wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 07:12 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:23:50PM +0200, Marian Marinov wrote:
> >>Hello Peter,
> >>
> >>I need help with the scheduler.
> >>
> >>I'm currently trying to patch the /proc/loadavg to show the load that is
> >>only related to the processes from the current cgroup.
> >>
> >>I looked trough the code and I was hoping that tsk->sched_task_group->cfs_rq
> >>struct will give me the needed information, but unfortunately for me, it did
> >>not.
> >>
> >>Can you advise me, how to approach this problem?
> >
> >Yeah, don't :-) Really, loadavg is a stupid metric.
>
> Yes... stupid, but unfortunately everyone is looking at it :(
>
> >
> >>I'm totally new to the scheduler code.
> >
> >Luckily you won't actually have to touch much of it. Most of the actual
> >loadavg code lives in the first ~400 lines of kernel/sched/proc.c, read
> >and weep. Its one of the best documented bits around.
>
> I looked trough it but I don't understand how to introduce the per cgroup calculation.
>
> I looked trough the headers and found the following, which is already implemented.
>
> task->sched_task_group->load_avg
> task->sched_task_group->cfs_rq->load_avg
> task->sched_task_group->cfs_rq->load.weight
> task->sched_task_group->cfs_rq->runnable_load_avg
>
> Unfortunately there is almost no documentation for these elements of the cfs_rq and task_group structs.
>
> It seams to me that part of the per task group loadavg code is already present.
No, those are actual load metrics and completely unrelated to loadavg.
Loadavg requires per-cgroup-per-cpu variants of nr_running and
nr_uninterruptible.
Those are the only metrics used in kernel/sched/proc.c for loadavg.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-14 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <52D35CD0.9070602@huawei.com>
[not found] ` <52D41316.5080508@yuhu.biz>
2014-01-13 17:12 ` Fwd: " Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-14 0:58 ` Marian Marinov
2014-01-14 10:05 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140114100541.GS7572@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mm@yuhu.biz \
--cc=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome