From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752034AbaAOBeW (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:34:22 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:35823 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751850AbaAOBeU (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 20:34:20 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:34:19 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Minchan Kim Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Nitin Gupta , Sergey Senozhatsky , Jerome Marchand Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4]zram: locking redesign Message-Id: <20140114173419.3122b69f2bbb1a311bfa65a2@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20140115012948.GE1992@bbox> References: <1389748270-15618-1-git-send-email-minchan@kernel.org> <20140115012948.GE1992@bbox> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:29:48 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote: > Oops, I missed Tested-by from Sergey. Really, sorry. > If I have a chance to resend from any review, I will add. Otherwise, > Andrew, Could you add his tested-by? Sure. I normally wouldn't consider such a patchset this late in the kernel cycle. But these patches speeds up some writes by 10x and zram is officially still in staging/. So I guess we could squeak these into 3.14. Prompt review and testing by others would be appreciated, please.