Re: [Question] Should we make the primary interrupt handler configurable for regmap_add_irq_chip()?

[Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1000 bytes --]

On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 07:33:13PM +0800, Yi Zhang wrote:
> 2014/1/15 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>:
> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 12:15:21PM +0800, Yi Zhang wrote:

> >> I met a scenario:
> >> As soon as the interrupt is triggered, a wakelock is needed to be held
> >> until the threaded handler finishes,
> >> I think we may hold it in the primary interrupt handler, but now it's
> >> NULL by default;

> > This sounds like something we should just support in the core, though to

> Sorry, I'm not clear about this, you mean that this has been supported
> in regmap framework?
> I searched but didn't find related mail about this, could you please
> kindly point out the mail loop?
> thanks very much;

I'm saying we should support it in the core rather than providing a way
to override the handlers - it seems like it'll be sufficiently common
that we'll rapidly end up with multiple implementations anyway.  It
isn't currently supported in the core though, someone would need to
write that code.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]