From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf stat: corrupts memory when using PMU cpumask
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 12:09:21 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140117140921.GB8801@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBSQ4vdT7-Cev86Bxt6T1uhiy-T28L2Eq5BzSPAC=mA8yw@mail.gmail.com>
Em Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:00:20AM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> The issue boils down to the fact that evsels have their file descriptors closed
> twice nowadays. Once in __run_per_stat() via perf_evsel__close_fd() and
> twice in perf_evlist__close().
> Now, calling close() twice is okay. However the fd is then set to -1.
> That's still okay with close(). The problem is elsewhere.
> It comes from the ncpus argument passed to perf_evsel__close(). It is
> DIFFERENT between the evsel and the evlist when cpumask are used.
> Take my case, 8 CPUs machine but a 1 CPU cpumask. The evsel allocates
> the xyarray for 1 CPU 1 thread. The fd are first close with 1 CPU, 1 thread.
> But then evlist_close() comes in and STILL thinks the events were using
> 8 CPUs, 1 thread and thus a xyarray of that size. And this causes writes
> to entries that are beyond the xyarray when the fds are set to -1, thereby
> causing memory corruption which I was lucky to catch via glibc.
> First, why are we closing the descriptors twice?
The idea here was to reduce the boilerplate that tools need to do when
they are done dealing with evlists, so evlist__delete would do what the
kernel does to resources allocated to a thread when it exits without
explicitely deallocating them: release them all.
So it seems, from your analysis, that bugs were left that need to be
hammered out so that this works as intended. Can you share your patch?
> Second, I have a fix that seems to work for me. It uses the evsel->cpus
> if evsel->cpus exists, otherwise it defaults to evtlist->cpus. Looks like
> a reasonable thing to do to me, but is it? I would rather avoid the double
> close altogether.
>
>
> Opinion?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-17 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-17 9:00 Stephane Eranian
2014-01-17 14:05 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2014-01-17 14:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2014-01-17 15:36 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140117140921.GB8801@infradead.org \
--to=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®