From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752738AbaATTLG (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:11:06 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:36503 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751936AbaATTLE (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2014 14:11:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 20:10:51 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Rik van Riel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, chegu_vinod@hp.com, mgorman@suse.de, mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] numa,sched: normalize faults_from stats and weigh by CPU use Message-ID: <20140120191051.GQ11314@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1389993129-28180-1-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com> <1389993129-28180-7-git-send-email-riel@redhat.com> <20140120165747.GL31570@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <52DD72C8.2050602@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52DD72C8.2050602@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 02:02:32PM -0500, Rik van Riel wrote: > That is what I started out with, and the results were not > as stable as with this calculation. > > Having said that, I did that before I came up with patch 7/7, > so maybe the effect would no longer be as pronounced any more > as it was before... > > I can send in a simplified version, if you prefer. If you could retry with 7/7, I don't mind adding the extra stats too much, but it would be nice if we can avoid it.