From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755264AbaA1SHl (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:07:41 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.226]:9326 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754599AbaA1SHk (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:07:40 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:07:34 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, pjt@google.com, bsegall@google.com, Vincent Guittot Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Various sched patches -v2 Message-ID: <20140128130734.2ddb595b@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20140128171634.974847076@infradead.org> References: <20140128171634.974847076@infradead.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.130:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 18:16:34 +0100 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Here's a set that seems to work properly and hopefully adresses all previously > raised issues. > > Daniel, I'm sorry, the idle_stamp thing wandered back over to fair.c :-) > > I did test the fair bits, including bandwidth (although not very > extensively). > > I did not test the dl/rt bits, Steve do you have a testcase for that? My sched tests are usually done by running some scheduling tests while recording sched switches and then analyzing it under kernelshark. I don't have many other tests that do pass fail. Hmm, I did have a couple of rt migration tests, but that's it. I'll take a look at theses tomorrow. -- Steve