From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Subject: [PATCH regression] dma-debug: fix overlap detection
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 19:00:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140129025817.10334.73833.stgit@viggo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
Commit 0abdd7a81b7e "dma-debug: introduce debug_dma_assert_idle()" was
reworked to expand the overlap counter to the full range expressable by
3 tag bits, but it has a thinko in treating the overlap counter as a
pure reference count for the entry.
Instead of deleting when the reference-count drops to zero, we need to
delete when the overlap-count drops below zero. Also, when detecting
overflow we can just test the overlap-count > MAX rather than applying
special meaning to 0.
Cc: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Reported-by: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
Regression report available here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=139073373932386&w=2
This patch, now tested on the original net_dma case, sees the expected
handful of reports before the eventual data corruption occurs.
lib/dma-debug.c | 10 +++++++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/dma-debug.c b/lib/dma-debug.c
index c38083871f11..2defd1308b04 100644
--- a/lib/dma-debug.c
+++ b/lib/dma-debug.c
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ static int active_pfn_set_overlap(unsigned long pfn, int overlap)
int i;
if (overlap > ACTIVE_PFN_MAX_OVERLAP || overlap < 0)
- return 0;
+ return overlap;
for (i = RADIX_TREE_MAX_TAGS - 1; i >= 0; i--)
if (overlap & 1 << i)
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ static void active_pfn_inc_overlap(unsigned long pfn)
* debug_dma_assert_idle() as the pfn may be marked idle
* prematurely.
*/
- WARN_ONCE(overlap == 0,
+ WARN_ONCE(overlap > ACTIVE_PFN_MAX_OVERLAP,
"DMA-API: exceeded %d overlapping mappings of pfn %lx\n",
ACTIVE_PFN_MAX_OVERLAP, pfn);
}
@@ -517,7 +517,11 @@ static void active_pfn_remove(struct dma_debug_entry *entry)
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&radix_lock, flags);
- if (active_pfn_dec_overlap(entry->pfn) == 0)
+ /* since we are counting overlaps the final put of the
+ * entry->pfn will occur when the overlap count is 0.
+ * active_pfn_dec_overlap() returns -1 in that case
+ */
+ if (active_pfn_dec_overlap(entry->pfn) < 0)
radix_tree_delete(&dma_active_pfn, entry->pfn);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&radix_lock, flags);
}
reply other threads:[~2014-01-29 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140129025817.10334.73833.stgit@viggo.jf.intel.com \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome