From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752991AbaA3J3G (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 30 Jan 2014 04:29:06 -0500
Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:44232 "EHLO
	merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752956AbaA3J3B (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 30 Jan 2014 04:29:01 -0500
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:28:35 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
        Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] setting the table for integration of cpuidle with
 the scheduler
Message-ID: <20140130092835.GL11314@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <1391017513-12995-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1391017513-12995-1-git-send-email-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:45:07PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> As everyone should know by now, we want to integrate the cpuidle
> governor with the scheduler for a more efficient idling of CPUs.
> In order to help the transition, this small patch series moves the
> existing interaction with cpuidle from architecture code to generic
> core code.  The ARM, PPC, SH and X86 architectures are concerned.
> No functional change should have occurred yet.
> 
> @peterz: Are you willing to pick up those patches?

Yeah.. no objections. Should I pick these up or will you be sending
another round?