From: Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@st.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Mohit KUMAR DCG <Mohit.KUMAR@st.com>,
spear-devel <spear-devel@list.st.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/8] phy: Initialize phy core with subsys_initcall
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:18:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140131034803.GA2618@pratyush-vbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201401301344.59196.arnd@arndb.de>
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 08:44:58PM +0800, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 30 January 2014, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 07:43:37PM +0800, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thursday 30 January 2014 04:18 PM, Mohit Kumar wrote:
> > > > From: Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@st.com>
> > > >
> > > > PCIe RC drivers are initialized with subsys_initcall. Few PCIe drivers
> > > > like SPEAr13xx needs phy drivers to be initialized.
> > >
> > > Instead change PCIe RC drivers to module init. Phy drivers should be loaded
> > > very early otherwise. (Hint: drivers/Makefile).
> >
> > I think PCIe RC driver can not be made module init. Bjorn can comment
> > better.
>
> I don't think there is any problem here: the PCI devices will only appear
> after the PCIe root bus has been probed. All drivers using the regular
> pci_driver framework should work fine even if they are loaded before the
> device is found. There are a handful of drivers using 'pci_get_device'
> rather than pci_register_driver, and those will break. As far as I can
> tell, those drivers are all x86 specific, and you should not worry about
> them.
>
> Having the PHY driver get initialized after the PCI root driver should
> also work, but it requires correct handling of -EPROBE_DEFER: if phy_get
I had issue with phy-core driver getting initialized after pcie rc
driver. I found a kernel crash, as devm_phy_get was called before
phy_class was created. I think this too need to be fixed, we should
not see a crash.
Anyway, I will keep spear phy and rc driver both with module_init and
-EPROBE_DEFER implementation.
Regards
Pratyush
> returns this error, the PCI driver must silently return the same error
> from its probe() function so it will get called again at a later time
> (after some other devices have been probed successfully).
>
> Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-31 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1391077731.git.mohit.kumar@st.com>
2014-01-30 10:48 ` Mohit Kumar
2014-01-30 11:43 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-01-30 11:52 ` Pratyush Anand
2014-01-30 12:10 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-01-30 12:15 ` Pratyush Anand
2014-01-30 12:25 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2014-01-30 12:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-01-31 3:48 ` Pratyush Anand [this message]
2014-01-31 15:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140131034803.GA2618@pratyush-vbox \
--to=pratyush.anand@st.com \
--cc=Mohit.KUMAR@st.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=spear-devel@list.st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome