From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754627AbaBEU4G (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:56:06 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com ([107.14.166.226]:29446 "EHLO cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754605AbaBEU4B (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:56:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:55:59 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Christoph Lameter Cc: Vladimir Davydov , rientjes@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, penberg@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] slub: fix false-positive lockdep warning in free_partial() Message-ID: <20140205155559.0884f959@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <52F1F25F.20402@parallels.com> <1391588133-15469-1-git-send-email-vdavydov@parallels.com> <20140205195837.GA6857@home.goodmis.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.118:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 5 Feb 2014 14:42:26 -0600 (CST) Christoph Lameter wrote: > > That, IMNSHO, is a much better solution > > Ok with me. It just adds another variant of remove_partial. That's a common practice in the kernel though. -- Steve