From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>, Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
mingo@kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
riel@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, davidlohr@hp.com,
hpa@zytor.com, andi@firstfloor.org, aswin@hp.com,
scott.norton@hp.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com
Subject: [PATCH 4/8] mutex: Unlock the mutex without the wait_lock
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:58:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140210203659.601973720@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140210195820.834693028@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: jason_low-mutex-unlock_the_mutex_without_the_wait_lock.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1980 bytes --]
When running workloads that have high contention in mutexes on an 8 socket
machine, mutex spinners would often spin for a long time with no lock owner.
The main reason why this is occuring is in __mutex_unlock_common_slowpath(),
if __mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock(), then the owner needs to acquire the
mutex->wait_lock before releasing the mutex (setting lock->count to 1). When
the wait_lock is contended, this delays the mutex from being released.
We should be able to release the mutex without holding the wait_lock.
Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Waiman.Long@hp.com
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: riel@redhat.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: davidlohr@hp.com
Cc: hpa@zytor.com
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org
Cc: aswin@hp.com
Cc: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: scott.norton@hp.com
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1390936396-3962-4-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com
---
kernel/locking/mutex.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -673,10 +673,6 @@ __mutex_unlock_common_slowpath(atomic_t
struct mutex *lock = container_of(lock_count, struct mutex, count);
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
- mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, nested, _RET_IP_);
- debug_mutex_unlock(lock);
-
/*
* some architectures leave the lock unlocked in the fastpath failure
* case, others need to leave it locked. In the later case we have to
@@ -685,6 +681,10 @@ __mutex_unlock_common_slowpath(atomic_t
if (__mutex_slowpath_needs_to_unlock())
atomic_set(&lock->count, 1);
+ spin_lock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
+ mutex_release(&lock->dep_map, nested, _RET_IP_);
+ debug_mutex_unlock(lock);
+
if (!list_empty(&lock->wait_list)) {
/* get the first entry from the wait-list: */
struct mutex_waiter *waiter =
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-10 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-10 19:58 [PATCH 0/8] locking/core patches Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-10 19:58 ` [PATCH 1/8] locking: Move mcs_spinlock.h into kernel/locking/ Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-10 19:58 ` [PATCH 2/8] mutex: In mutex_can_spin_on_owner(), return false if task need_resched() Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-10 21:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-10 19:58 ` [PATCH 3/8] mutex: Modify the way optimistic spinners are queued Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-11 1:33 ` Jason Low
2014-02-11 7:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-10 19:58 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-02-10 19:58 ` [PATCH 5/8] locking, mutex: Cancelable MCS lock for adaptive spinning Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-10 21:15 ` Jason Low
2014-02-10 21:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-10 22:04 ` Jason Low
2014-02-11 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-11 9:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-02-25 19:56 ` Jason Low
2014-02-26 9:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-26 17:45 ` Jason Low
2014-02-10 19:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] mutex: Extra reschedule point Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-10 22:59 ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-10 19:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] locking: Introduce qrwlock Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-11 18:17 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-11 20:12 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-13 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-13 17:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-14 19:01 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-14 18:48 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-10 19:58 ` [PATCH 8/8] x86,locking: Enable qrwlock Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-10 23:02 ` [PATCH 0/8] locking/core patches Andrew Morton
2014-02-11 7:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-11 8:03 ` Andrew Morton
2014-02-11 8:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-02-11 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-11 21:37 ` Waiman Long
2014-02-25 19:26 ` Jason Low
2014-02-26 21:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140210203659.601973720@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=aswin@hp.com \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=waiman.long@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®