From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Preeti Murthy <preeti.lkml@gmail.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] idle: store the idle state index in the struct rq
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:41:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140211164136.GT27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52EFC12B.50704@linux.intel.com>
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 08:17:47AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 2/3/2014 6:56 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> if there's a simple api like
>
> sched_cpu_cache_wiped(int llc)
>
> that would be very nice for this; the menuidle side knows this
> for some cases and thus can just call it. This would be a very
> small and minimal change
>
> * if you don't care about llc vs core local caches then that
> parameter can go away
>
> * I assume this is also called for the local cpu... if not then we
> need to add a cpu number argument
>
> * we can also call this from architecture code when wbinvd or the
> arm equivalent is called etc
A little something like so?
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/sched/fair.c | 13 ++++++++++---
kernel/sched/sched.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index fb9764fbc537..b06bcadc6d71 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5466,6 +5466,27 @@ static void update_top_cache_domain(int cpu)
}
/*
+ * Mark the current LLC as empty.
+ */
+void sched_llc_wipe_cache(void)
+{
+ struct sched_domain *sd;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ sd = rcu_dereference(__get_cpu_var(sd_llc));
+ if (sd) {
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+
+ rq->llc_wiped = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
+ }
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
+/*
* Attach the domain 'sd' to 'cpu' as its base domain. Callers must
* hold the hotplug lock.
*/
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 235cfa7ad8fc..9f8ce98f8131 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5025,9 +5025,10 @@ static void move_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
/*
* Is this task likely cache-hot:
*/
-static int
-task_hot(struct task_struct *p, u64 now, struct sched_domain *sd)
+static int task_hot(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
{
+ u64 now = rq_clock_task(env->src_rq);
+ struct sched_domain *sd = env->sd;
s64 delta;
if (p->sched_class != &fair_sched_class)
@@ -5049,6 +5050,12 @@ task_hot(struct task_struct *p, u64 now, struct sched_domain *sd)
if (sysctl_sched_migration_cost == 0)
return 0;
+ /*
+ * If its LLC got wiped after it ran last, we're as cold as it gets.
+ */
+ if ((s64)(p->se.exec_start - env->src_rq->llc_wiped) < 0)
+ return 0;
+
delta = now - p->se.exec_start;
return delta < (s64)sysctl_sched_migration_cost;
@@ -5187,7 +5194,7 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
* 2) task is cache cold, or
* 3) too many balance attempts have failed.
*/
- tsk_cache_hot = task_hot(p, rq_clock_task(env->src_rq), env->sd);
+ tsk_cache_hot = task_hot(p, env);
if (!tsk_cache_hot)
tsk_cache_hot = migrate_degrades_locality(p, env);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 1bf34c257d3b..c98793112614 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -582,6 +582,7 @@ struct rq {
struct list_head cfs_tasks;
+ u64 llc_wiped;
u64 rt_avg;
u64 age_stamp;
u64 idle_stamp;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-11 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-30 14:09 [RFC PATCH 0/3] cpuidle/sched: move main idle function in the idle.c Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] cpuidle: split cpuidle_idle_call main function into functions Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 15:39 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 19:39 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-31 14:10 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] cpuidle: move the cpuidle_idle_call function to idle.c Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 19:42 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-30 14:09 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] idle: store the idle state index in the struct rq Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 15:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 16:27 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 16:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-30 17:25 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-30 17:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-30 21:02 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-31 9:46 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-01-31 10:04 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-31 10:44 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-31 8:45 ` Preeti Murthy
2014-01-31 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-31 9:39 ` Preeti U Murthy
2014-01-31 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-01-31 14:04 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-31 14:12 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2014-01-31 15:07 ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-01-31 15:37 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-31 15:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-01-31 16:35 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-01-31 16:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-01-31 18:19 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-01 6:00 ` Brown, Len
2014-02-01 15:31 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-01 19:39 ` Brown, Len
2014-02-01 20:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-01 15:40 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-02-03 12:54 ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-02-03 14:38 ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-02-03 14:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-03 16:17 ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-02-11 16:41 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2014-02-11 17:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-02-11 19:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-02-12 15:16 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-02-12 16:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-02-12 17:37 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-02-12 19:05 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-02-04 9:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-02-04 14:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-02-04 14:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2014-02-03 14:58 ` Nicolas Pitre
2014-01-31 10:15 ` Daniel Lezcano
2014-02-03 6:33 ` Preeti U Murthy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140211164136.GT27965@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=preeti.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome